Article 61
It's the broadcast treaty. You simply have to publish something and then you own it. This is going to be awesome.
View ArticleIs it just Legal paranoia ?
It may just be they are scared s*itless about being sued for missing out a copyright attribution. I don't think anyone's going to get into legal trouble for falsely putting a copyright notice on a...
View ArticleCopyright on an image
Not that I'm to 'up' on this (as the unfortunates who have read my previous post will be all to painfully aware) But if you have an image that's copyrighted, and you change the aspect ratio (or indeed...
View ArticleRe: Copyright on an image
Not that I'm to 'up' on this (as the unfortunates who have read my previous post will be all to painfully aware) But if you have an image that's copyrighted, and you change the aspect ratio (or indeed...
View ArticleArticle 57
Considering the fonts are the same, I think we can probably assume the Daily mail are using it like we might use an @ sign...
View ArticleRe: Re: Copyright on an image
Personally think that modifications that have been made primarily for the purpose of obtaining a new copyright should not qualify. That isn't what the law says - it's what I think it should say.
View ArticleArticle 55
The Daily Mail is a joke of a newspaper which has consistently spread false information and whipped up mass hysteria over nothing so it does not surprise me at all that they do not seem to understand...
View ArticleThe "I do wonder if" blog, no news, just speculation.
In other news, dog sees cat: I do wonder if the dog will bark?
View ArticleRe:
this demonstrates their cluelessness on all topics... the daily mail list of things which give you cancer! http://hellokinsella.posterous.com/the-daily-mail-list-of-things-that-give-you-c
View ArticleRe: "whipped up mass hysteria over nothing"
Wow, it's a meta-story for Mike, then, as he's merely whipping up fanboys over nothing here!
View ArticleArticle 51
In fact, I'm beginning to wonder if the ... editors at the Daily Mail are just clueless, Having read far too many Daily Mail articles, this wouldn't surprise me at all. I'm not even sure how they could...
View ArticleRe: Re: "whipped up mass hysteria over nothing"
Having gotten that out of your system, do you have anything approaching a reasonable explanation for the question at hand?
View ArticleArticle 47
It would seem that the Mail uses a copyright symbol as some kinda shorthand attribution tag. I'm calling it 'lazy' over 'malicious'
View ArticleRe: The "I do wonder if" blog, no news, just speculation.
Not m,ine. The cat's in a box, sealed, with a vial of bromide gas.
View ArticleRe: The "I do wonder if" blog, no news, just speculation.
The "nothing to contribute" troll post. In other news, troll has nothing to contribute: I do wonder if the troll will post? How about Ken brings something to Mike
View Article
